Magnitsky’s Mother Goes to the Russian Supreme Court to Overturn the Second Posthumous Case Against Her Murdered Son

November 21, 2014

Sergei Magnitsky’s moth­er has filed a com­plaint with the judi­cial col­legium of the Supreme Court of Rus­sia in rela­tion to the sec­ond posthu­mous pro­ceed­ing orga­nized against her son by the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Ministry.

Under this sec­ond posthu­mous case, Sergei Mag­nit­sky has been named after his death as a “co-con­spir­a­tor” in the $230 mil­lion tax refund fraud that he had in fact uncov­ered and exposed.

…Inves­ti­ga­tor Urzhumt­sev in vio­la­tion of the prin­ci­ple of pre­sump­tion of inno­cence, in vio­la­tion of the con­sti­tu­tion­al right for defence, in the absence of a court order, in the absence of pre­lim­i­nary inves­ti­ga­tion, had stat­ed in his decree [from Decem­ber 2010] that Sergei Mag­nit­sky who died a year before [in Novem­ber 2009] in Matrosskaya Tishi­na deten­tion cen­ter, com­mit­ted a seri­ous crime… the theft of 5.4 bil­lion rubles [$230 mil­lion]…The con­clu­sion itself must be qual­i­fied as slan­der in rela­tion to know­ing­ly inno­cent per­son,” says the complaint.

 He [Inves­ti­ga­tor Urzhumt­sev] knew very well, that Mag­nit­sky not only was not com­plic­it in the theft of 5.4 bil­lion rubles, but that Mag­nit­sky was the first per­son who had uncov­ered the crime com­mit­ted against the three com­pa­nies of his client, and who had exposed the crim­i­nal activ­i­ty of per­haps one of the largest crim­i­nal groups which spe­cial­izes in unlaw­ful tax refunds,” says the complaint.

Inte­ri­or Min­istry Inves­ti­ga­tor Oleg Urzhumt­sev was includ­ed on both the inves­tiga­tive team on the case against Sergei Mag­nit­sky under which Mag­nit­sky was arrest­ed and ill-treat­ed in cus­tody; and on the case to inves­ti­gate the $230 mil­lion theft that Mag­nit­sky had uncov­ered. The sec­ond inves­ti­ga­tion led by Inves­ti­ga­tor Urzhumt­sev fin­ished by exon­er­at­ing all Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry and tax offi­cials from lia­bil­i­ty for the $230 mil­lion theft, and nam­ing Sergei Mag­nit­sky as co-con­spir­a­tor posthu­mous­ly and in secret from his rel­a­tives. Urzhumt­sev also was respon­si­ble for assign­ing the blame for the crime to a “job­less” per­son named Vyach­eslav Khleb­nikov in a fast-track pro­ceed­ing which end­ed with a lenient sen­tence of five years for the $230 mil­lion theft. As part of that pro­ceed­ing con­duct­ed after Magnitsky’s death, Khleb­nikov gave a false tes­ti­mo­ny against Mag­nit­sky from detention.

As mem­ber of the inves­tiga­tive group [on the case Sergei Mag­nit­sky was detained], Urzhumt­sev knew that Mag­nit­sky was arrest­ed soon after his tes­ti­mo­ny impli­cat­ing offi­cials in the theft of 5.4 bil­lion rubles, and that some of those offi­cials were includ­ed on the same inves­tiga­tive team,-  points out the com­plaint. — Mag­nit­sky stat­ed that his crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion was a mea­sure of repres­sion aimed to pun­ish him for the assis­tance he pro­vid­ed to his client dur­ing the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of cir­cum­stances of the theft of his client’s com­pa­nies — Rilend, Makhaon, and Par­fe­nion.”

The com­plaint says that Inves­ti­ga­tor Urzhumt­sev has con­cealed the real per­pe­tra­tors by blam­ing the $230 mil­lion theft on Sergei Mag­nit­sky, and two oth­er deceased indi­vid­u­als (Mr Gasanov and Mr Korobeinikov), nei­ther of whom were alive and could be ques­tioned at the time of the investigation.

The evi­dence in the case file objec­tive­ly demon­strates that Inves­ti­ga­tor Urzhumt­sev act­ed in the inter­ests of per­sons who per­pe­trat­ed the theft of 5.4 bil­lion rubles [$230 mil­lion], and who using his own ter­mi­nol­o­gy, “found” two deceased indi­vid­u­als in order to put on them the lia­bil­i­ty for the theft of bud­get funds, and in order to pro­vide the ser­vice of con­ceal­ment for the real per­pe­tra­tors of the crime,” says the complaint.

It was since uncov­ered that Mr Gasanov died on 1 Octo­ber 2007, two months before the $230 mil­lion was com­mit­ted. Mr Korobeinikov died in Sep­tem­ber 2008, “falling of a bal­cony” of a build­ing under con­struc­tion, accord­ing to the Russ­ian investigation.

Ms Mag­nit­skaya asks the Russ­ian Supreme Court to exam­ine the law­ful­ness of inves­ti­ga­tor Urzhumtsev’s actions and annul pre­vi­ous deci­sions by low­er-lev­el Russ­ian courts who reject­ed her complaints.

The court must check the law­ful­ness and the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the Investigator’s decree… The pre­vi­ous rejec­tion vio­lates the con­sti­tu­tion­al prin­ci­ple of the pre­sump­tion of inno­cence because deceased Mag­nit­sky was named by Inves­ti­ga­tor Urzhumt­sev as a co-con­spir­a­tor in a crime,” says the complaint.

The court had an oppor­tu­ni­ty to check the argu­ments using the crim­i­nal case files, and by invit­ing inves­ti­ga­tor Urzhumt­sev to give tes­ti­mo­ny, but it failed to do so…As a result, the con­clu­sion of the court [of low­er instance] is not sup­port­ed by the fac­tu­al cir­cum­stances, which is … the ground to can­cel the court deci­sion,” says the com­plaint in conclusion.

Pre­vi­ous com­plaints from Ms Mag­nit­skaya addressed to low­er instance courts have been reject­ed by Moscow dis­trict judge Tatiana Nevero­va, and Moscow city court judges Andrei Titov and Lyubov Ishmuratova.

In the Unit­ed States, 26 Russ­ian offi­cials and pri­vate indi­vid­u­als involved in Sergei Magnitsky’s deten­tion and ill-treat­ment in cus­tody and in the crim­i­nal con­spir­a­cy Mag­nit­sy had uncov­ered have been sanc­tioned under the US Mag­nit­sky Act. The list includes sev­er­al col­leagues of Inves­ti­ga­tor Urzhumt­sev on the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Ministry’s inves­tiga­tive team in the Mag­nit­sky case.

Sergei Magnitsky’s Mother Slams the Russian Authorities Refusal to Investigate the Murder of Her Son on the 5th Anniversary of His Death

November 19, 2014

Sergei Magnitsky’s moth­er has spo­ken of the suf­fer­ing she has been sub­ject­ed to in her calls to seek jus­tice for her mur­dered son in Russia.

In an exten­sive inter­view to the Open Rus­sia web­site, Natalia Mag­nit­skaya spoke of her grief of the way that Russ­ian offi­cials have dealt with her complaints.

All our appli­ca­tions and com­plaints to all gov­ern­ment bod­ies are being reject­ed. I can’t read these rejec­tions any more. It is clear that they are sim­ply mock­ing us. For exam­ple, they sent us mate­ri­als to read, but the copies are so poor it was impos­si­ble to read them. My lawyer filed com­plaint to the high­er-lev­el body, but his com­plaint was reject­ed. They said essen­tial­ly that all is ok, there is no need for you to read them.”

Natalia Mag­nit­skaya also depict­ed her anguish at the lies offi­cial­ly issued by the Russ­ian Gen­er­al Prosecutor’s Office, which jus­ti­fied the posthu­mous tri­al of her son by claim­ing that the fam­i­ly had asked for it:

Recent­ly, one of the doc­u­ments from the Gen­er­al Prosecutor’s Office said that they had ini­ti­at­ed the case against Mag­nit­sky on the request from his moth­er. But we had stat­ed in writ­ing on so many occa­sions that we do not want the posthu­mous pros­e­cu­tion. Howcouldthisbe?”

Natalia Mag­nit­skaya described the strug­gle to seek jus­tice for her son in Rus­sia as “fac­ing a wall,” but said she con­tin­ues to chal­lenge the rejec­tions nev­er­the­less and seek jus­tice and is not pre­pared to give up:

So far every­thing has been with­out effect. In spite of this we try to chal­lenge every­thing, but it gives you the feel­ing that you are fac­ing a wall…But we should not stop…It is impos­si­ble to give in.”

In anoth­er report on the Open Rus­sia web­site in mem­o­ry of Sergei Mag­nit­sky, Russ­ian jour­nal­ist and human rights activist Zoya Sve­to­va recalled how she and oth­er mem­bers of the Moscow Pub­lic Over­sight Com­mis­sion inves­ti­gat­ed the cir­cum­stances of his mur­der in detention.

We wrote report and sent it on 31 Decem­ber 2009 to the Pres­i­dent of Rus­sia, the Gen­er­al Prosecutor’s Office and the Min­istry of Jus­tice. In our report, we wrote that we do not trust the tes­ti­mo­ny of deten­tion offi­cials and are con­vinced that the right to life of Mag­nit­sky was vio­lat­ed. In oth­er words, the lawyer was murdered.” 

Also on the Open Rus­sia web­site, Russ­ian play­wright Ele­na Grem­i­na, author of the play, “One Hour Eigh­teen Min­utes,” which depicts the last hours of Sergei Magnitsky’s life, spoke of how work­ing with the Mag­nit­sky sto­ry changed her and those who worked on the play with her:

It was decid­ed, as usu­al­ly hap­pens with new ideas, to gath­er doc­u­ments and mate­ri­als about Sergei Mag­nit­sky to see if his sto­ry had poten­tial for a play. I did not know then that the gath­er­ing of mate­ri­als for this prospec­tive play would change us, would intro­duce us to new ideas and new peo­ple, that it would change a lot in me.”

Mate­ri­als to Com­mem­o­rate the 5th Anniver­sary of Sergei Magnitsky’s Killing in Cus­tody can be found on Open Rus­sia web­site.

Russia is Preparing for a Showdown at Interpol to Seek the Arrest of William Browder – CEO of Hermitage Capital & Leader of Magnitsky Justice Campaign for the 3rd time

November 17, 2014

As the world marks the fifth anniver­sary of the mur­der in Russ­ian police cus­tody of Her­mitage Capital’s lawyer, Sergei Mag­nit­sky, the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment is push­ing Inter­pol to arrest William Brow­der, CEO of Her­mitage and leader of the Mag­nit­sky Jus­tice campaign.

The deci­sion on Mr Brow­der will be a test case for the new lead­er­ship at Inter­pol.  Mr Jür­gen Stock from the Ger­man Fed­er­al Crim­i­nal Police was elect­ed on 7 Novem­ber 2014 as Interpol’s new Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary, replac­ing US rep­re­sen­ta­tive Ron Noble (http://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/Structure-and-governance/J%C3%BCrgen-Stock), and for­mer Croa­t­ian judge Nina Vajić was appoint­ed as chair to Inter­pol’s Com­mis­sion for Con­trol of Files in Sep­tem­ber 2014, replac­ing for­mer Irish Data Pro­tec­tion Com­mis­sion­er Bil­ly Hawkes (http://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2014/N2014-165).

Inter­pol’s Com­mis­sion for Con­trol of Files will be decid­ing on the Russ­ian government’s third Red Notice appli­ca­tion for Brow­der at the meet­ing on Novem­ber 20th - 21st 2014 at the Inter­pol head­quar­ters in Lyon. The Inter­pol Com­mis­sion reject­ed Russia’s pre­vi­ous two appli­ca­tions for Brow­der as “pre­dom­i­nant­ly polit­i­cal” and con­trary to Interpol’s Constitution.

Rus­sia has clear­ly dis­re­gard­ed Interpol’s two pre­vi­ous deci­sions on Mr Browder’s case as polit­i­cal, and con­tin­ues to press Inter­pol on the basis of a bar­bar­ic posthu­mous tri­al and doc­u­ments pre­pared by Russ­ian offi­cials in the Mag­nit­sky case who have been sanc­tioned in the West,” said a Her­mitage Cap­i­tal representative.

The Brow­der-led Mag­nit­sky jus­tice cam­paign has been cred­it­ed with suc­cess­ful­ly impos­ing US visa and finan­cial sanc­tions on Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry offi­cials and judges respon­si­ble for Sergei Magnitsky’s arrest, ill-treat­ment and death in custody.

Now Rus­sia is press­ing Inter­pol to arrest Mr Brow­der on the basis of the Russ­ian case orga­nized by those same sanc­tioned Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry offi­cials and judges. The case has been ongo­ing for many years, and has been high­light­ed by the Coun­cil of Europe as emblem­at­ic of polit­i­cal­ly moti­vat­ed abus­es of the jus­tice sys­tem in Russia.

Rus­si­a’s third request to Inter­pol for Brow­der’s arrest is based on that same case, which cul­mi­nat­ed last year in Rus­sia with the con­vic­tions of Sergei Mag­nit­sky posthu­mous­ly and Mr Brow­der in absen­tia as “co-con­spir­a­tors” in the first-ever posthu­mous tri­al in Russ­ian his­to­ry.  It is only the sec­ond posthu­mous tri­al in Euro­pean his­to­ry, since the 897 Cadav­er Syn­od when Pope For­mo­sus’ remains were dug out of the ground to face charges after a ver­dict by Pope Stephen VI that the deceased had been unwor­thy of the pontificate.

Today’s equiv­a­lent of Pope Stephen VI is Russ­ian judge Igor Alisov. He presided over the posthu­mous tri­al of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and in absen­tia tri­al against Brow­der in July 2013, and one month lat­er he was pro­mot­ed by Russia’s Pres­i­dent Vladimir Putin.  In May 2014, Judge Alisov was placed on the Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions list by the US Government.

Judge Ele­na Stashina is anoth­er Russ­ian judge involved in the posthumous/in absen­tia pro­ceed­ings against Mag­nit­sky and Brow­der. Under the same case, she signed the arrest war­rant for Mr Brow­der and ear­li­er for Mr Mag­nit­sky. Serv­ing as the Tver­skoi dis­trict judge in Moscow when Sergei Mag­nit­sky was alive, she reject­ed his com­plaints about cru­el treat­ment and vio­la­tions of his rights, and extend­ed his deten­tion with­out tri­al just four days before he was killed.

Judge Stashina has also been sanc­tioned by the US Gov­ern­ment under the “Sergei Mag­nit­sky Rule of Law Account­abil­i­ty Act of 2012.”

This week it will be up to Interpol’s Com­mis­sion, led by Ms Vajic with four spe­cial­ists from Cana­da, France, Turkey, and Mau­ri­tius, to decide whether to uphold Interpol’s two pre­vi­ous rejec­tions of the Russ­ian request, or to approve the request, using the posthu­mous tri­al as the basis for that change in posi­tion.  The lat­est Russ­ian request forms part of the Russ­ian state’s polit­i­cal attack against Mr Brow­der, which has been ongo­ing for sev­er­al years.

Statement by Bill Browder on 5th Anniversary of Sergei Magnitsky’s Killing in Russia

November 16, 2014

Dear Friends and supporters,

 Today marks the 5th anniver­sary of Sergei Mag­nit­sky’s killing in Russ­ian police custody. 

Sergei was my lawyer who was mur­dered because he exposed one of the largest gov­ern­ment cor­rup­tion schemes in Russ­ian his­to­ry. After he tes­ti­fied against the police offi­cers involved, he was arrest­ed by the same offi­cers and was then sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly tor­tured for 358 days. On Novem­ber 16, 2009 he went into crit­i­cal con­di­tion and instead of being treat­ed, he was put in an iso­la­tion cell and beat­en by eight riot guards with rub­ber batons until he was dead at the age of 37.

When I learned of Sergei’s death, it was the worst news I had ever received in my life. It was like a knife going into my heart and I made a vow to myself, his fam­i­ly and his mem­o­ry that I would get jus­tice for him. For five years, I have tried to get that jus­tice, but the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment has used every tool at their dis­pos­al to thwart me. They claimed Sergei was nev­er tor­tured and he died of nat­ur­al caus­es. They claimed that he nev­er uncov­ered or exposed a crime, but was the one guilty of one. And most shock­ing­ly, they exon­er­at­ed every sin­gle Russ­ian state employ­ee involved in spite of a moun­tain of doc­u­men­tary evi­dence to the contrary.

 It became clear to me that there was no pos­si­bil­i­ty of jus­tice inside of Rus­sia so I sought jus­tice out­side of Rus­sia and have advo­cat­ed for sanc­tions against the peo­ple who killed Sergei in many coun­tries in the West. Three years after Sergei’s death, the US gov­ern­ment signed the Sergei Mag­nit­sky Rule of Law Account­abil­i­ty Act impos­ing visa sanc­tions and asset freezes on those involved in Sergei’s death as well as oth­er human rights vio­la­tions. Sim­i­lar sanc­tions are being con­sid­ered by gov­ern­ments in Europe as well.

 Putin and his gov­ern­ment have become infu­ri­at­ed at the glob­al reac­tion to Sergei’s case and have lashed out in all sorts of ways. Short­ly after the Mag­nit­sky Act was passed, Putin banned US adop­tions of dis­abled Russ­ian chil­dren. In 2013, more than three years after Sergei died, they put him on tri­al in the first ever posthu­mous tri­al in the his­to­ry of Rus­sia. They also put me on tri­al in absen­tia as his co-defen­dant and sen­tenced me to nine years.

 When I first start­ed this cam­paign, many peo­ple thought that what hap­pened to Sergei was some kind of anom­aly. They said “this is a sad sto­ry, but prob­a­bly a one-off”, but as time has gone by, more and more cas­es like this have sur­faced and it’s becom­ing obvi­ous to every­one that Rus­sia is a crim­i­nal state tak­ing inno­cent peo­ple hostage and doing hor­rif­ic things to them. The most recent actions in Ukraine make it clear to even the most ardent Russ­ian apol­o­gists that Rus­sia is engag­ing in all sorts of atroc­i­ties and brazen­ly cov­er­ing them up.

What hap­pened to Sergei is now a glob­al sym­bol of every­thing that is wrong with Rus­sia, from the actu­al crime of what they did to Sergei to the high lev­el cov­er-up to the threats against me and oth­ers seek­ing jus­tice. Despite the many hor­rif­ic threats and all the mis­in­for­ma­tion Rus­sia is spew­ing out in this case, I won’t back down in my call for jus­tice for Sergei Mag­nit­sky and nei­ther will those close to him.  We will not stop until the peo­ple who tor­tured and killed Sergei are prop­er­ly brought to justice.

Thank you for your con­tin­ued sup­port on this impor­tant mission.

Two Minute Tribute Song on YouTube to Mark 5th Anniversary of Sergei Magnitsky’s Murder in Russian Police Custody

November 16, 2014

Screen shot 2014-11-15 at 3.06.48 PM

We Remem­ber You

 -

To com­mem­o­rate the fifth anniver­sary of Sergei Mag­nit­sky’s death in Russ­ian police cus­tody, please join us by watch­ing a short song on YouTube devot­ed to Sergei’s life and his sac­ri­fice (LINK to Song).

Sergei Mag­nit­sky was a 37-year old Russ­ian anti-cor­rup­tion lawyer who uncov­ered a $230 mil­lion fraud per­pe­trat­ed by Russ­ian gov­ern­ment offi­cials and organ­ised crim­i­nals. After he impli­cat­ed Russ­ian police offi­cers in the crime, he was arrest­ed by the very same offi­cers, tor­tured and bru­tal­ly killed at Matrosskaya Tishi­na pre-tri­al deten­tion cen­ter in Moscow on 16 Novem­ber 2009.

The Mag­nit­sky music video goes on to show poignant images of Rus­sians protest­ing against the impuni­ty in the Mag­nit­sky case car­ry­ing posters: “Fight­ing Cor­rup­tion Can Kill”; “Putin is not Rus­sia”, “Our Free­dom Can’t Be Tak­en Away”, “I Will Fight for My Rights.”

Screen shot 2014-11-16 at 2.28.51 PM

Russ­ian Civ­il Rights Activists in Mag­nit­sky Protests in Moscow

 

Screen shot 2014-11-15 at 3.13.08 PM

The Mag­nit­sky music video also presents images of a young Sergei Mag­nit­sky, and of his rest­ing place at a Moscow cemetery.

The video con­cludes with a pho­to of Sergei on hol­i­day with his friends and the by-line: “Russ­ian hero.”

While the killing of Sergei Mag­nit­sky has ignit­ed world­wide con­dem­na­tion and lead to numer­ous polit­i­cal and legal calls for jus­tice around the globe, five years on there has still been no jus­tice for Sergei Mag­nit­sky in Rus­sia. Instead, he him­self was posthu­mous­ly pros­e­cut­ed in the first posthu­mous tri­al in the his­to­ry of Rus­sia, with the judge pre­sid­ing at the tri­al imme­di­ate­ly pro­mot­ed by Russ­ian Pres­i­dent Vladimir Putin. The Russ­ian author­i­ties also last year closed the inves­ti­ga­tion into his death find­ing “no sign of crime,” and refused all appli­ca­tions from Sergei Magnitsky’s moth­er to reopen the inves­ti­ga­tion into the evi­dence of his tor­ture and murder.

On Fri­day, the US State Depart­ment released a state­ment on the eve of the fifth anniver­sary of Sergei Magnitsky’s death which says:

Despite wide­ly-pub­li­cized, cred­i­ble evi­dence of crim­i­nal con­duct result­ing in Magnitskiy’s death, Russ­ian author­i­ties have failed to bring to jus­tice those respon­si­ble. We remain con­cerned about impuni­ty for this crime and the atmos­phere of intim­i­da­tion for those who work to uncov­er cor­rup­tion or human rights abus­es in the Russ­ian Fed­er­a­tion. On the fifth anniver­sary of Magnitskiy’s death, we con­tin­ue to call for full account­abil­i­ty for those respon­si­ble for his unjust impris­on­ment and wrong­ful death and we will con­tin­ue to ful­ly sup­port the efforts of those in Rus­sia who seek to bring these indi­vid­u­als to jus­tice, includ­ing through imple­men­ta­tion of the Sergei Mag­nit­sky Rule of Law Account­abil­i­ty Act of 2012.” (http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/11/234094.htm)

Sergei Mag­nit­sky’s case and the impuni­ty of the Russ­ian offi­cials involved have become a sym­bol of the cor­rup­tion and fail­ing jus­tice sys­tem in Rus­sia, and of the abuse of the rights of its cit­i­zens who chal­lenge the authorities.

The Sergei Mag­nit­sky trib­ute song was writ­ten by a song­writer Samuel Smith, and record­ed as a result of a request made on www.movements.org, a crowd-sourc­ing plat­form for human rights activists around the world. The video direct­ed by Alexan­dra Agee­va has been cre­at­ed by Russ­ian civic rights activists, includ­ing Pussy Riot, who con­duct­ed a series of one-per­son protest actions around Moscow this summer.

Trib­ute to Sergei Mag­nit­sky five years after his death by Russ­ian civ­il soci­ety activists

Tweet and pass along (LINK to Song)

Soft­ly spo­ken, words bleed the truth
And help dis­cov­er the bro­ken and confused
The fight for jus­tice and the path of one man
Bring new begin­nings and take down cor­rupt plans

Sergei,
You can’t pass away from the peo­ple who know
Sergei,
Your words lead the way for the world to go

You didn’t lose your life in vain
Every­one on Earth will remem­ber the name
Sergei,
Every­one on Earth will remem­ber the name

Jailed for the words that he spoke
His name lives on
In the name of the music and the folks
Who fail to for­get that rulers need
To show respect to the peo­ple they lead

Sergei,
You can’t pass away from the peo­ple who know
Sergei,
Your words lead the way for the world to go

You didn’t lose your life in vain -
Every­one on Earth will remem­ber the name
Sergei,
Every­one on Earth will remem­ber the name
Sergei
Sergei

Next Page »

  • Link

Hermitage TV

Visit “Stop the Untouchables” site

For more information please visit http://russian-untouchables.com site..
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.