UK Magnitsky Asset Freezing Legislation Passed the Second Reading in the House of Lords

March 16, 2017

PRESS RELEASE
For Imme­di­ate distribution

 

UK Mag­nit­sky Asset Freez­ing Leg­is­la­tion Passed the Sec­ond Read­ing in the House of Lords 

16 March 2017 – The UK House of Lords approved in its sec­ond read­ing the Mag­nit­sky asset freez­ing leg­is­la­tion, which will allow the British gov­ern­ment to freeze the assets of human rights abusers. The bill is now slat­ed for a line-by-line exam­i­na­tion in the House of Lords on 28 March 2017.

I wel­come the fact that we have tak­en action, send­ing a clear state­ment that we will not allow human rights abusers to laun­der their crim­i­nal assets through the UK,” said Baroness Williams of Traf­ford, Min­is­ter of State at the Home Office, intro­duc­ing the pro­posed Mag­nit­sky legislation.

Under this new leg­is­la­tion, assets of those involved in gross human rights vio­la­tions abroad will be sub­ject to civ­il recov­ery by the British gov­ern­ment. The ini­tia­tive was inspired by the case of Sergei Magnitsky:

We have amend­ed the Bill … to allow for the civ­il recov­ery of any pro­ceeds of gross human rights abuse over­seas. This amend­ment was prompt­ed by the hor­rif­ic treat­ment of Sergei Mag­nit­sky, a Russ­ian tax lawyer. …Magnitsky’s treat­ment was tru­ly shock­ing, and it is only one exam­ple of the many atro­cious human rights vio­la­tions com­mit­ted glob­al­ly every year,” said Baroness Williams of Trafford.

Baroness Stern said:

The vic­tims of grand cor­rup­tion are too many to count… The Mag­nit­sky amend­ment rep­re­sents a huge step for­ward and I was very glad to hear the Min­is­ter talk about human rights abus­es around the world in this con­nec­tion. Some argue that grand cor­rup­tion should be clas­si­fied as a human rights abuse; I find that argu­ment convincing.”

Lord Rook­er said:

I salute Mr Brow­der for his ded­i­ca­tion and per­se­ver­ance in try­ing to bring those guilty of the mur­der of his lawyer to jus­tice… Chas­ing them legal­ly around the world, and now in this Bill, is a must.”

Baroness Hamwee said:

Cor­rup­tion and the infringe­ment of human rights go hand in hand. I wel­come the Mag­nit­sky amendment.”

In clos­ing the debate, Baroness Williams of Traf­ford talked about the gov­ern­ment ensur­ing that “the Mag­nit­sky pow­er will be used” in cas­es where there is evi­dence “to sat­is­fy a court on the bal­ance of prob­a­bil­i­ties that prop­er­ty in the UK is the pro­ceeds of gross human rights abus­es or vio­la­tions overseas.”

The events of the Mag­nit­sky case are described in the inter­na­tion­al best-sell­er “Red Notice” by William Brow­der and in a series of Mag­nit­sky jus­tice cam­paign videos on Youtubechan­nel “Russ­ian Untouchables.”

 

For more infor­ma­tion, please contact:

Jus­tice for Sergei Magnitsky

+44 207 440 1777

e‑mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

billbrowder.com

twitter.com/Billbrowder

 

Today the UK Parliament Passed Historic Magnitsky Asset Freezing Sanctions

February 21, 2017

Press Release

For Imme­di­ate Distribution

 

Today the UK Par­lia­ment Passed His­toric Mag­nit­sky Asset Freez­ing Sanctions 

21 Feb­ru­ary 2017 – Today the UK House of Com­mons unan­i­mous­ly passed the UK Mag­nit­sky Sanc­tions legislation.

The Mag­nit­sky Sanc­tions leg­is­la­tion was vot­ed on as part of the UK Crim­i­nal Finances Bill. It will allow the British gov­ern­ment to freeze assets of human rights abusers in the UK. The Mag­nit­sky Sanc­tions amend­ment which passed was sub­mit­ted by UK Home Sec­re­tary Amber Rudd.

The new Mag­nit­sky Sanc­tions Leg­is­la­tion is going to cause per­cep­ti­ble fear for klep­to­crats in Rus­sia and oth­er author­i­tar­i­an regimes. They all have expen­sive prop­er­ties in Lon­don and think they are untouch­able,” said William Brow­der, leader of the glob­al Mag­nit­sky Jus­tice Cam­paign and author of “Red Notice: How I Became Putin’s No 1 Ene­my.”

This effort is the result of sev­en years of advo­ca­cy in the name of the late Sergei Mag­nit­sky who uncov­ered and tes­ti­fied about the US$230 mil­lion cor­rup­tion scheme per­pe­trat­ed by Russ­ian offi­cials and was killed for his whis­tle-blow­ing,” said William Browder.

Should the House of Lords pass this into law, the UK will be the sec­ond coun­try in Europe to pass Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions and will set a strong exam­ple for the rest of Europe,” said William Browder.

The new UK Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions leg­is­la­tion intro­duces gross human rights abuse as part of the unlaw­ful con­duct, to which civ­il recov­ery pow­ers can now be applied under Part 5 of the Pro­ceeds of Crime Act 2002.

The UK Mag­nit­sky leg­is­la­tion pro­tects those who “have sought to expose the ille­gal activ­i­ty car­ried out by a pub­lic offi­cial or a per­son act­ing in an offi­cial capac­i­ty, or to obtain, exer­cise, defend or pro­mote human rights and fun­da­men­tal free­doms.” (full text here).

Sergei Mag­nit­sky was a Russ­ian lawyer who uncov­ered the mas­sive cor­rup­tion per­pe­trat­ed sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly by Russ­ian offi­cials and orga­nized crim­i­nals, which includ­ed thefts from the Russ­ian trea­sury, includ­ing the theft of US$230 mil­lion in 2007. Instead of pur­su­ing the offi­cials who approved the thefts, the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment arrest­ed Sergei Mag­nit­sky and put him in pre-tri­al deten­tion, where he was tor­tured for 358 days and killed at the age of 37. All offi­cials impli­cat­ed in his tor­ture and the mul­ti-mil­lion dol­lar thefts have been exonerated.

In response to the impuni­ty demon­strat­ed by the Mag­nit­sky case in Rus­sia, the US passed the Rus­sia-focused Mag­nit­sky Act enact­ing US asset freezes and visa bans in 2012 and the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Act which applies to human rights vio­la­tors around the world in 2016. Esto­nia passed its Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Act leg­is­la­tion in 2016. Cur­rent­ly, Cana­da and the EU are con­sid­er­ing their own ver­sions of Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions as well.

The new UK Mag­nit­sky Leg­is­la­tion deals with asset freez­ing on human rights abusers. We will con­tin­ue to cam­paign for visa sanc­tions on human rights abusers in the UK under sep­a­rate leg­is­la­tion,” said Mag­nit­sky cam­paign leader William Browder.

 

For more infor­ma­tion, please contact:

Jus­tice for Sergei Magnitsky

+44 207 440 1777

e‑mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

billbrowder.com

twitter.com/Billbrowder

 

Russia Reissues Arrest Warrant for William Browder and his Magnitsky Justice Campaign Colleague

February 17, 2017

Press Release

For Imme­di­ate Distribution

 

Rus­sia Reis­sues Arrest War­rant for William Brow­der and his Mag­nit­sky Jus­tice Cam­paign Colleague

 

17 Feb­ru­ary 2017 — Today, the Tver­skoi Dis­trict Court in Moscow reis­sued an arrest war­rant for William Brow­der, head of the Mag­nit­sky Jus­tice Cam­paign, and his col­league, Ivan Cherkasov, in the lat­est act of retal­i­a­tion against the campaigners.

The Russ­ian arrest war­rant is in clear response to the glob­al roll-out of the Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions leg­is­la­tion. In Decem­ber 2016, the US Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Act was signed by the US pres­i­dent, and on the same day the Eston­ian Mag­nit­sky Act was signed by Esto­ni­a’s president.

In the fol­low­ing month, Russ­ian author­i­ties scur­ried to pro­duce mul­ti­ple decrees lead­ing to the cur­rent arrest warrant.

The arrest war­rant approved by judge Gordeev is issued under the long-run­ning crim­i­nal pro­ceed­ings, orches­trat­ed by the Russ­ian FSB, and used in July 2013 to con­duct the posthu­mous tri­al against Sergei Mag­nit­sky and in absen­tia Mr Brow­der (case No 153123, from which a file was sep­a­rat­ed and giv­en a new num­ber No 41701007754000008).

The repeat arrest war­rant has been imme­di­ate­ly dis­patched to the Russ­ian Nation­al Cen­tral Bureau of Interpol.

Russ­ian attempts to use Inter­pol in their attack against William Brow­der have been reject­ed by Inter­pol three times since 2013 as polit­i­cal­ly moti­vat­ed and in vio­la­tion of Interpol’s Rules.

The UK author­i­ties have also refused mul­ti­ple requests by Rus­sia for mutu­al legal assis­tance in the pro­ceed­ings against William Brow­der and his col­league because the British gov­ern­ment deemed such assis­tance would be con­trary to UK’s pub­lic order, sov­er­eign­ty and oth­er nation­al interests.

The repeat Russ­ian arrest war­rant for Messrs Brow­der and Cherkasov is the fourth attempt by Russ­ian author­i­ties to try to mis­use the mech­a­nisms of inter­na­tion­al legal coop­er­a­tion for polit­i­cal purposes.

To jus­ti­fy their repeat arrest war­rant, the Russ­ian author­i­ties con­tin­ue to rely on stale alle­ga­tions of cor­po­rate tax eva­sion, in spite of the fact that the paid tax­es had been stolen by a group of Russ­ian offi­cials in the US$230 mln tax rebate fraud exposed by Sergei Magnitsky.

The lat­est arrest war­rant also alleges that Brow­der and Cherkasov were involved in “false bank­rupt­cy.” This alle­ga­tion was made by Russ­ian Gen­er­al Pros­e­cu­tor Chai­ka who accused Brow­der of fund­ing a video expos­ing the abuse and cor­rup­tion by Chaika’s fam­i­ly, in which Brow­der had no involvement.

In sup­port of the repeat arrest war­rant, the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry pro­duced doc­u­ments from FSB, Rus­si­a’s secu­ri­ty ser­vice, includ­ing tes­ti­mo­ny obtained from a Russ­ian nation­al at the FSB’s region­al head­quar­ters, where, accord­ing to him and his lawyer, he was pres­sured and threat­ened with death “like Magnitsky.”

The arrest war­rant is signed by Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry Inves­ti­ga­tor Ranchenkov and sanc­tioned by a senior Inte­ri­or Min­istry offi­cial Krakovsky. Oth­er Russ­ian offi­cials par­tic­i­pat­ing in this pro­ceed­ing are pros­e­cu­tor of the Gen­er­al Prosecutor’s Office Kulikov and Russ­ian tax ser­vice offi­cial Mostovoi, pre­vi­ous­ly involved in the posthu­mous tri­al against Sergei Mag­nit­sky, act­ing on pow­er of attor­ney signed by the head of the Russ­ian tax ser­vice Mishustin.

 

For more infor­ma­tion, please contact:

Jus­tice for Sergei Magnitsky

+44 207 440 1777

e‑mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

billbrowder.com

twitter.com/Billbrowder

 

US Government Sanctions Further Russian Human Rights Violators Under Magnitsky Act

January 9, 2017

PRESS RELEASE

For Ime­di­ate distribution

 

US Gov­ern­ment Sanc­tions Fur­ther Russ­ian Human Rights Vio­la­tors Under Mag­nit­sky Act

 

9 Jan­u­ary 2017 – The US Gov­ern­ment has sanc­tioned fur­ther indi­vid­u­als in the Mag­nit­sky case, includ­ing its most high-pro­file des­ig­na­tion to date — Alexan­der Bas­trykin, head of the Russ­ian State Inves­tiga­tive Committee.
The Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions are the most effec­tive tool avail­able today for fight­ing the impuni­ty of cor­rupt offi­cials in Rus­sia. Today’s release of the new names includes the high­est lev­el gov­ern­ment offi­cial to date, Alexan­der Bas­trykin. In addi­tion to the role he played in the Mag­nit­sky case, he has been respon­si­ble for many oth­er shock­ing human rights abuse cas­es. His inclu­sion on this list is a major vic­to­ry in our fight for jus­tice in Rus­sia,” said William Brow­der, leader of glob­al Mag­nit­sky jus­tice campaign.

 

Alexan­der Bas­trykin, in his capac­i­ty as head of the Inves­tiga­tive Com­mit­tee, per­son­al­ly over­saw the inves­ti­ga­tions into the false arrest, tor­ture and death in Russ­ian police cus­tody of Sergei Mag­nit­sky who had uncov­ered the US$230 mil­lion theft by Russ­ian officials.

 

In spite of the con­clu­sions of the Russ­ian President’s Human Rights Coun­cil on the wrong­ful arrest of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and the con­flict of inter­est of impli­cat­ed offi­cials, the Bas­trykin-led Inves­tiga­tive Com­mit­tee closed the death inves­ti­ga­tion, find­ing no crime was com­mit­ted by any Russ­ian officials.

 

Bas­trykin direct­ed and pub­licly jus­ti­fied the exon­er­a­tion of all offi­cials involved. In his inter­view to the Russ­ian state news­pa­per, Rossi­iskaya Gaze­ta, on 7 Sep­tem­ber 2010, Alexan­der Bas­trykin said:

 

There is no ground to think that his [Mag­nit­sky’s] death was con­nect­ed to actions of offi­cials who pros­e­cut­ed him. There is no objec­tive infor­ma­tion show­ing that he was pros­e­cut­ed ille­gal­ly or that the phys­i­cal and psy­cho­log­i­cal pres­sure was applied to him.”
Anoth­er sanc­tioned offi­cial under today’s des­ig­na­tions is Stanislav Gordievsky from the Russ­ian Inves­tiga­tive Com­mit­tee, to whom Sergei Mag­nit­sky gave tes­ti­mo­ny on 5 June 2008 and 7 Octo­ber 2008 iden­ti­fy­ing the offi­cials and organ­ised crim­i­nals involved in the theft of com­pa­nies and the US$230 mil­lion of tax monies from the Russ­ian government.

 

The names in Mag­nit­sky’s tes­ti­mo­ny includ­ed Lt Col Artem Kuznetsov, Major Pavel Kar­pov, lawyers work­ing for the crim­i­nal group Andrei Pavlov and Yulia Mairo­va and oth­ers. Instead of prop­er­ly inves­ti­gat­ing the fraud and bring­ing the offi­cials exposed by Mag­nit­sky to jus­tice, inves­ti­ga­tor Gordievsky request­ed one of the main named sus­pects — Lt Col Kuznetsov – to inves­ti­gate him­self — and then Gordievsky exon­er­at­ed Kuznetsov from any wrong-doing.

 

In the sub­se­quent tes­ti­mo­ny of 14 Octo­ber 2009 from pre-tri­al deten­tion, Sergei Mag­nit­sky described this cov­er up in great detail:

 

The same autho­rized oper­a­tive Kuznetsov …pro­vid­ed the oper­a­tional assis­tance on the case …ini­ti­at­ed by the Inves­tiga­tive Com­mit­tee… on the sub­ject of the theft of the com­pa­nies. In addi­tion, he was pro­vid­ing oper­a­tional assis­tance on the crim­i­nal case under which I was accused. I believe that the crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion against me is the above per­son’s revenge against me, because dur­ing my meet­ings with inves­ti­ga­tor S.E. Gordievsky… I …expressed my opin­ion that Kuznetsov .… should be inter­ro­gat­ed about the cir­cum­stances of steal­ing.…, instead of being allowed to per­form oper­a­tional assis­tance on the case inves­ti­gat­ed by S.E. Gordievsky.

 

A third indi­vid­ual includ­ed today in the US Government’s Mag­nit­sky list is Gen­nady Plaksin. Gen­nady Plaksin was a mem­ber of the Klyuev Organ­ised Crime Group, and chair­man of the board and nom­i­nal share­hold­er of Uni­ver­sal Sav­ings Bank on behalf of Dmit­ry Klyuev, who is already sub­ject to Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions. Mr Plaksin appeared as a nom­i­nal claimant in a col­lu­sive court case orches­trat­ed by the crim­i­nal group to steal US$230 mil­lion from the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment. Plaksin was involved in the cre­ation of US$325 mil­lion of fic­ti­tious lia­bil­i­ties. Despite the evi­dence of his role in the US$230 mil­lion theft uncov­ered by Sergei Mag­nit­sky, Mr Plaksin was exon­er­at­ed in Russia.

 

The US$230 mil­lion fraud was a sophis­ti­cat­ed crim­i­nal con­spir­a­cy per­pe­trat­ed in Rus­sia to steal US$230 mil­lion of tax­es paid by the three Russ­ian com­pa­nies of the Her­mitage Fund, at the time the largest port­fo­lio investor in Rus­sia. The plan­ning of the fraud scheme took place abroad, and mon­ey laun­der­ing of a sub­stan­tial por­tion of the US$230 mil­lion fraud pro­ceeds also took place out­side of Rus­sia and involved mul­ti­ple inter­na­tion­al banks and accounts.

 

Hermitage’s out­side lawyer Sergei Mag­nit­sky uncov­ered the US$230 mil­lion fraud scheme and tes­ti­fied against those involved, includ­ing Andrei Pavlov.

 

Short­ly there­after, the Russ­ian author­i­ties arrest­ed Sergei Mag­nit­sky, and tried to force him to change his tes­ti­mo­ny sub­ject­ing him to cru­el and degrad­ing treat­ment dur­ing 358 days in pre-tri­al deten­tion. When their attempts failed, Sergei Mag­nit­sky was killed in Russ­ian police deten­tion at the age of 37, leav­ing a wife and two children.

 

The events of the Mag­nit­sky case are described in the New-York Times best-sell­er “Red Notice” by William Brow­der and in a series of Mag­nit­sky jus­tice cam­paign videos on Youtube chan­nel “Russ­ian Untouchables.”

 

For more infor­ma­tion, please contact:

 

Jus­tice for Sergei Magnitsky

+44 207 440 1777

e‑mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

billbrowder.com

twitter.com/Billbrowder

 

Magnitsky Campaign Releases Names of 28 Russian Officials Currently Involved in the Posthumous Cases Against Magnitsky for Inclusion on New International Sanctions Lists

December 27, 2016

PRESS RELEASE

For Imme­di­ate Distribution

Mag­nit­sky Cam­paign Releas­es Names of 28 Russ­ian Offi­cials Cur­rent­ly Involved in the Posthu­mous Cas­es Against Mag­nit­sky for Inclu­sion on New Inter­na­tion­al Sanc­tions Lists

 

27 Decem­ber 2016 — Today, the Glob­al Cam­paign for Jus­tice for Sergei Mag­nit­sky pub­lished a list of 28 Russ­ian offi­cials involved in cur­rent crim­i­nal cas­es against Sergei Mag­nit­sky in spite of the fact that he was killed in police cus­tody in 2009.

 

The list includes 28 offi­cials from the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry, Pros­e­cu­tor’s Office, FSB and the Inves­tiga­tive Committee.

 

The release of these new names coin­cides with the con­sid­er­a­tion or pas­sage of Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions leg­is­la­tion in the Unit­ed States, Cana­da, the U.K., Esto­nia and at the EU.

 

The two Russ­ian offi­cials who had insti­gat­ed the per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky posthu­mous­ly — Deputy Gen­er­al Pros­e­cu­tor Vic­tor Grin and Inte­ri­or Min­istry inves­ti­ga­tor Oleg Urzhumt­sev — have already been sanc­tioned under the “Sergei Mag­nit­sky Rule of Law Account­abil­i­ty Act.

 

The Russ­ian offi­cials list­ed below have reject­ed numer­ous com­plaints filed by Mag­nit­sky’s moth­er, Natalia Magnitskaya.

Mrs Mag­nit­skaya’s most recent com­plaint filed by her lawyer with the Russ­ian author­i­ties seek­ing to end the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of her son, said:

 

It is cur­rent­ly known that the same crim­i­nal group [which stole US$230 mil­lion] per­pe­trat­ed a num­ber of sim­i­lar crimes, and the amount of funds stolen from the bud­get is about US$800 mil­lion. S. Mag­nit­sky was placed into cus­tody on 24 Novem­ber 2008 soon after he gave tes­ti­mo­ny impli­cat­ing mem­bers of this crim­i­nal group. In a lit­tle less than a year, on 16 Novem­ber 2009, he was found dead in the cell of the col­lec­tion unit of Matrosskaya Tishi­na deten­tion cen­ter. The loca­tion and nature of injuries on his body indis­putably tes­ti­fy to the vio­lent caus­es of the death of S.Magnitsky.

After S. Mag­nit­sky was phys­i­cal­ly elim­i­nat­ed, inves­ti­ga­tor O. Urzhumt­sev cre­at­ed a know­ing­ly false ver­sion of the crime, as pur­port­ed­ly com­mit­ted by S. Mag­nit­sky him­self, which was aimed to com­pro­mise the deceased and was mon­strous in its cyn­i­cism and injustice.”

The Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry refused Mrs Mag­nit­skaya’s com­plaint against her son’s posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion on the ground that Mrs Mag­nit­skaya did not have a pro­ce­dur­al sta­tus to lodge this com­plaint, and said:

The inves­ti­ga­tion sees no grounds to treat Mrs Mag­nit­skaya as a per­son whose inter­ests are affect­ed by the crim­i­nal prosecution.”

 

The refusal of Mrs Mag­nit­skaya’s com­plaint was pre­pared by Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry inves­ti­ga­tor Ranchenkov pur­suant to a crim­i­nal case about the laun­dered US$230 mil­lion pro­ceeds of fraud — the crime uncov­ered by Sergei Mag­nit­sky and in which he is being posthu­mous­ly accused by the Russ­ian author­i­ties. This posthu­mous pro­ceed­ing is cur­rent­ly over­seen by deputy head of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment Krakovsky and deputy head of the Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Direc­torate of Inves­ti­ga­tions of Organ­ised Crim­i­nal Activ­i­ty Shneiderman.

 

List of Offi­cials Per­se­cut­ing Sergei Mag­nit­sky Posthu­mous­ly — 2011 – 2016:

 

  1. R. Fil­ip­pov — inves­ti­ga­tor of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment, respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky under case No 678540
  2. P. Tam­bovt­sev - inves­ti­ga­tor of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment, respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky under case No 678540
  3. A. Ranchenkov — inves­ti­ga­tor of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment, respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky under case No 678540
  4. Y. Shinin - first deputy head of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment who sanc­tioned the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Magnitsky
  5. M. Alexan­drov - head of Direc­torate of Inves­ti­ga­tions of Organ­ised Crime and Cor­rup­tion of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment, deputy head of the Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment, and then deputy head of the Gen­er­al Pros­e­cu­tor’s Office Direc­torate of the Over­sight over Inves­ti­ga­tions of Espe­cial­ly Impor­tant Cas­es, over­see­ing cas­es against Sergei Mag­nit­sky posthumously
  6. A. Saribzhanov - deputy head of Direc­torate of Inves­ti­ga­tions of Organ­ised Crime and Cor­rup­tion of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment who refused com­plaint from Mag­nit­sky’s moth­er against the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of her son
  7. S. Shamin — head of 2nd sec­tion of Direc­torate of Inves­ti­ga­tions of Organ­ised Crime and Cor­rup­tion of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment who sanc­tioned posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Magnitsky
  8. A. Ryabt­sev — head of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Main Depart­ment of Eco­nom­ic Secu­ri­ty and Com­bat­ing Corruption(Department “K”), involved in the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and exon­er­a­tion of those involved in Mag­nit­sky’s death
  9. D. Mityaev — offi­cial of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Main­De­part­ment of Eco­nom­ic Secu­ri­ty and Com­bat­ing Corruption(Department “K”), involved in the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and exon­er­a­tion of those involved in Mag­nit­sky’s death
  10. A. Krakovsky - deputy head of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky sev­en years after his death in custody
  11. S. Shnei­der­man - deputy head of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky sev­en years after his death in custody
  12. S. Mura­shev - deputy head of sec­ond sec­tion of the Direc­torate of the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Inves­tiga­tive Depart­ment respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky sev­en years after his death in custody
  13. V. Yudin — head of the Russ­ian Gen­er­al Pros­e­cu­tor’s Office Direc­torate of Over­sight over Inves­ti­ga­tions of Espe­cial­ly Impor­tant Cas­es, respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Magnitsky
  14. V. Ignashin — deputy head of the Russ­ian Gen­er­al Pros­e­cu­tor’s Office Direc­torate of Over­sight over Inves­ti­ga­tions of Espe­cial­ly Impor­tant Cas­es, respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Magnitsky
  15. S. Bochkarev — pros­e­cu­tor of the Russ­ian Gen­er­al Pros­e­cu­tor’s Office Direc­torate of Over­sight over Inves­ti­ga­tions of Espe­cial­ly Impor­tant Cas­es, respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Magnitsky
  16. A. Kulikov — pros­e­cu­tor of the sec­ond sec­tion of the Russ­ian Gen­er­al Pros­e­cu­tor’s Office Direc­torate of Over­sight over Inves­ti­ga­tions of Espe­cial­ly Impor­tant Cas­es, respon­si­ble for the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Magnitsky
  17. D. Stroitelev — head of sec­tion of the FSB’s Direc­torate K (Finan­cial Coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence) involved in the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and refusal of com­plaint from Mag­nit­sky’s mother
  18. V. Komarov — offi­cer of the FSB’s Direc­torate K (Finan­cial Coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence) involved in the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Magnitsky
  19. A. Pogreb­nyak — offi­cer of the FSB’s Direc­torate K (Finan­cial Coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence) involved in the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Magnitsky
  20. E. Gol­ubev — inves­ti­ga­tor of the Russ­ian Inves­ti­ga­tions Com­mit­tee who exon­er­at­ed tax offi­cials from lia­bil­i­ty for the US$230 mil­lion theft and posthu­mous­ly per­se­cut­ed Sergei Mag­nit­sky in spite of com­plaints from Mag­nit­sky’s mother
  21. V. Aly­shev — deputy head of the Main Inves­tiga­tive Direc­torate of the Russ­ian Inves­ti­ga­tions Com­mit­tee who exon­er­at­ed from lia­bil­i­ty Inte­ri­or Min­istry offi­cials who per­se­cut­ed Sergei Magnitsky
  22. A. Iskant­sev — act­ing head of the Main Inves­tiga­tive Direc­torate of the Russ­ian Inves­ti­ga­tions Com­mit­tee who exon­er­at­ed from lia­bil­i­ty Inte­ri­or Min­istry offi­cials who per­se­cut­ed Sergei Magnitsky
  23. S. Olkhovnikov — deputy head of the sec­ond inves­tiga­tive sec­tion of the first inves­tiga­tive depart­ment for Cen­tral Dis­trict of the Main Inves­tiga­tive Direc­torate of the Russ­ian Inves­ti­ga­tions Com­mit­tee over­see­ing the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and the exon­er­a­tion of offi­cials impli­cat­ed by Mag­nit­sky in the US$230 mil­lion theft
  24. S. Kiryukhin — head of the sec­ond inves­tiga­tive sec­tion of the first inves­tiga­tive depart­ment of the Main Inves­tiga­tive Direc­torate of the Russ­ian Inves­ti­ga­tions Com­mit­tee over­see­ing the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and the exon­er­a­tion of offi­cials impli­cat­ed by Mag­nit­sky in the US$230 mil­lion theft
  25. L. Kolobko­va — deputy head of the first inves­tiga­tive depart­ment of the Main Inves­tiga­tive Direc­torate of the Russ­ian Inves­ti­ga­tions Com­mit­tee over­see­ing the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and the exon­er­a­tion of offi­cials impli­cat­ed by Mag­nit­sky in the US$230 mil­lion theft
  26. A. Prokopets — act­ing head of the first inves­tiga­tive depart­ment of the Main Inves­tiga­tive Direc­torate of the Russ­ian Inves­ti­ga­tions Com­mit­tee over­see­ing the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and the exon­er­a­tion of offi­cials impli­cat­ed by Mag­nit­sky in the US$230 mil­lion theft
  27. R. Erd­niev — deputy head of the Direc­torate of Pro­ce­dur­al Over­sight over Inves­ti­ga­tions of Espe­cial­ly Impor­tant Cas­es in Fed­er­al Dis­tricts of the Russ­ian Inves­ti­ga­tions Com­mit­tee over­see­ing the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and the exon­er­a­tion of offi­cials impli­cat­ed by Mag­nit­sky in the US$230 mil­lion theft
  28. Y. Tyu­tyun­nik — act­ing head of the Main Inves­tiga­tive Direc­torate of the Inves­ti­ga­tions Com­mit­tee over­see­ing the posthu­mous per­se­cu­tion of Sergei Mag­nit­sky and the exon­er­a­tion of offi­cials impli­cat­ed by Mag­nit­sky in the US$230 mil­lion theft.

 

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion please contact:

 

Glob­al Jus­tice for Sergei Magnitsky

+44 207 440 1777

info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

www.billbrowder.com

twitter.com/Billbrowder

 

Extract from Mrs Mag­nit­skaya’s Com­plaint against her son’s posthu­mous persecution

Below is an extract from the com­plaint filed with the Russ­ian Inte­ri­or Min­istry by Mrs Mag­nit­skaya’s lawyer against her son’s posthu­mous persecution:

The inves­ti­ga­tion of this crim­i­nal case affects the con­sti­tu­tion­al rights of Mrs Mag­nit­skaya and her deceased son. 

Since the end of 2007 and in 2008 Sergei Mag­nit­sky took active part in expos­ing the crim­i­nal group respon­si­ble for the theft of 5.4 bil­lion rou­bles [US$230 mil­lion] from the state bud­get under the dis­guise of a tax refund. 

Today, the inves­ti­ga­tion has numer­ous proofs that the theft had been com­mit­ted by the crim­i­nal group which com­prised heads of Moscow Tax Inspec­torates No 25 and 28 E.Khimina and O.Stepanova and their sub­or­di­nates; own­er and employ­ees of Uni­ver­sal Sav­ings Bank; pre­vi­ous­ly con­vict­ed Markelov, Kurochkin and Khleb­nikov;  offi­cials from the Moscow Inte­ri­or Min­istry’s Tax Crime Depart­ment  who assist­ed them, and others. 

Fur­ther­more, it is cur­rent­ly known that the same crim­i­nal group per­pe­trat­ed a num­ber of sim­i­lar crimes, and the amount of funds stolen from the bud­get is about US$800 mil­lion. The theft of 5.4 bil­lion rou­bles was not the first and not the last in the list of their crimes. Hav­ing unlim­it­ed finan­cial resources at their dis­pos­al and hav­ing secured pro­tec­tion at the high admin­is­tra­tive lev­el, they have organ­ised per­se­cu­tion against those who dis­rupt­ed and exposed their crim­i­nal activity.

  1. Mag­nit­sky was placed into cus­tody on 24 Novem­ber 2008 soon after he gave tes­ti­mo­ny impli­cat­ing mem­bers of this crim­i­nal group. In a lit­tle less than a year, on 16 Novem­ber 2009, he was found dead in the cell of the col­lec­tion unit of Matrosskaya Tishi­na deten­tion cen­ter. The loca­tion and nature of injuries on his body indis­putably tes­ti­fy to the vio­lent caus­es of the death of S.Magnitsky.

After S. Mag­nit­sky was phys­i­cal­ly elim­i­nat­ed, inves­ti­ga­tor O. Urzhumt­sev cre­at­ed a know­ing­ly false ver­sion of the crime, as pur­port­ed­ly com­mit­ted by S. Mag­nit­sky him­self, which was aimed to com­pro­mise the deceased and was mon­strous in its cyn­i­cism and injustice.

The decree to com­mence a crim­i­nal case, inves­ti­ga­tor O.Urzhumtsev includ­ed data about alleged com­plic­i­ty of S. Mag­nit­sky in the 5.4 bil­lion rou­bles theft, which in fact S.Magnitsky had uncovered.”

The com­plaint from Mrs Mag­nit­skaya’s lawyer fur­ther says that the con­clu­sion on com­plic­i­ty of S. Mag­nit­sky in the wrong-doing is a know­ing lie and slan­der, con­trary to the arti­cle 8 of the Russ­ian Crim­i­nal Pro­ce­dure Code which stip­u­lates that no one can be recog­nised as guilty in com­mit­ting the offence in the absence of a court judgment.

« Previous PageNext Page »

  • Link

Hermitage TV

Visit “Stop the Untouchables” site

For more information please visit http://russian-untouchables.com site..