US Criminal Grand Jury Convened to Examine Involvement of Son of Senior Russian Government Official in $230 Million Fraud exposed by Sergei Magnitsky

May 27, 2016

PRESS RELEASE

For Imme­di­ate distribution

 

US Crim­i­nal Grand Jury Con­vened to Exam­ine Involve­ment of Son of Senior Russ­ian Gov­ern­ment Offi­cial in $230 Mil­lion Fraud exposed by Sergei Magnitsky

 

27 May 2016 – A US crim­i­nal grand jury has been con­vened to exam­ine the involve­ment of Denis Kat­syv, son of Russ­ian gov­ern­ment offi­cial Petr Kat­syv, in the US$230 mil­lion fraud uncov­ered by Sergei Mag­nit­sky.  In 2008, Pre­ve­zon, a Cyprus-based com­pa­ny owned by Denis Kat­syv, received funds traced by the US Depart­ment of Jus­tice and the Swiss Gen­er­al Prosecutor’s office to the US$230 mil­lion fraud uncov­ered by Sergei Magnitsky.

 

Since Sep­tem­ber 2013, Denis Katsyv’s com­pa­nies have been sub­ject to a U.S. civ­il for­fei­ture case brought by the US Depart­ment of Jus­tice for mon­ey laun­der­ing. Under that case the US gov­ern­ment has frozen $14 mil­lion of assets belong­ing to Kat­syv’s companies.

 

The defen­dants [com­pa­nies owned by Denis Katsvy] were involved in the laun­der­ing of the pro­ceeds of the Russ­ian fraud, which itself amounts to an elab­o­rate series of crim­i­nal offences,” said US Jus­tice Depart­ment in its court fil­ing in New York.

 

It is …entire­ly prop­er for the grand jury to inves­ti­gate whether the defen­dants [Katsyv’s com­pa­nies], who received pro­ceeds from the fraud, were involved in it,” said the US Depart­ment of Justice.

 

A Crim­i­nal Grand jury is a form of crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion in the Unit­ed States used to deter­mine whether crim­i­nal charges should be brought against poten­tial defendants.

 

Pre­vi­ous­ly, Katsyv’s com­pa­nies tried to chal­lenge the US and Swiss asset freez­ing orders, but courts in the US and Switzer­land denied those motions and con­firmed that the freez­ing was justified.

 

The wire trans­fers to Pre­ve­zon from the $230 mil­lion fraud uncov­ered by Sergei Mag­nit­sky showed high­ly unusu­al pay­ments. Pre­ve­zon dis­guised incom­ing pay­ments for “san­i­tary equip­ment” and “auto parts,” which were sup­posed to be sup­plied but nev­er deliv­ered because Pre­ve­zon was in fact a real estate company.

 

Accord­ing to the US Depart­ment of Jus­tice, the fal­si­fied con­tracts used to jus­ti­fy Pre­ve­zon’s incom­ing wire trans­fers claimed that Pre­ve­zon was sup­posed to deliv­er 500 acrylic bath sets under the brand name “Doc­tor Jet,” man­u­fac­tured in Sicil­ia, Italy, with dimen­sions of 190 x 12095 x 65, to two shell com­pa­nies in Moldo­va which did not do any legit­i­mate busi­ness and nev­er in fact pur­chased the bath sets.

 

Pre­ve­zon explained these sus­pi­cious wire trans­fers to the US Court stat­ing that an agree­ment exist­ed between its Russ­ian direc­tor, a stu­dent named Tim­o­fei Krit, and “investor Petrov,” and denied knowl­edge of false wire descriptions.

 

How­ev­er, dur­ing its inves­ti­ga­tion, the US Jus­tice Depart­ment iden­ti­fied fur­ther false and ques­tion­able wire trans­fers to Pre­ve­zon from com­pa­nies in Belize, BVI, etc. for an addi­tion­al amount of US$2 mil­lion. These wire trans­fers were sim­i­lar­ly dis­guised as pay­ments for com­put­ers, video, home equip­ment, etc. that again were nev­er delivered.

 

Pre­vi­ous­ly, Denis Katsyv’s firm Mar­tash paid US$8 mil­lion under the 2005 mon­ey laun­der­ing case by the State of Israel.

 

Denis Kat­syv’s father, Petr Kat­syv, has been Vice Pres­i­dent of OAO Russ­ian Rail­ways, a state trans­porta­tion monop­oly, since 2014. Before that, he was Vice Pre­mier of the Gov­ern­ment and Trans­porta­tion Min­is­ter in the Moscow Region. Con­tracts with Moscow Region’s gov­ern­ment struc­tures sup­port­ed the busi­ness of his son, Denis Kat­syv.

 

Sim­i­lar­ly, Denis Katsyv’s Russ­ian lawyer Natalia Vesel­nit­skaya devel­oped her busi­ness in part on con­tracts with Moscow gov­ern­ment agen­cies, where her hus­band is Deputy Min­is­ter of Trans­porta­tion (and was deputy to Kat­syv senior dur­ing his time as Min­is­ter of Trans­porta­tion), and pre­vi­ous­ly, between 1984 – 2000 was offi­cial with­in the Moscow Region’s Prosecutor’s Office.

 

Accord­ing to court fil­ings, Petr Kat­syv was pre­vi­ous­ly in con­tact with the FBI to pro­vide infor­ma­tion on Russ­ian orga­nized crime but with­drew his pro­pos­al, when he was informed by the US author­i­ties that his coop­er­a­tion would not help set­tle the mon­ey laun­der­ing and civ­il for­fei­ture case by the US Jus­tice Depart­ment pend­ing in the South­ern Dis­trict Court of New York.

 

Sergei Mag­nit­sky, who uncov­ered the US$230 mil­lion fraud and tes­ti­fied about the com­plic­i­ty of Russ­ian offi­cials in it, was tor­tured and killed in Russ­ian police cus­tody at the age of 37. The unprece­dent­ed events of this case are described in the New-York Timesbest-sell­er by William Brow­der, leader of glob­al ‘Jus­tice for Sergei Mag­nit­sky’ cam­paign, called “Red Notice. How I Became Putin’s No 1 Ene­my,” and in a series of jus­tice cam­paign videos on Youtube chan­nel “Russ­ian Untouch­ables.”

 

For more infor­ma­tion, please contact:

 

Jus­tice for Sergei Magnitsky

+44 207 440 1777

e‑mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

billbrowder.com

https://twitter.com/Billbrowder

В США открыто уголовное дело в отношении компаний сына российского чиновника Дениса Кацыва

May 27, 2016

ПРЕСС-РЕЛИЗ

Для немедленного распространения

В США открыто уголовное дело в отношении компаний сына российского чиновника Дениса Кацыва

 

27 May 2016 – Правительство США открыло уголовное расследование компаний сына российского чиновника Дениса Кацыва, об этом сообщается в документах, представленных в американский суд Правительством США по иску об отмывании компаниями Кацыва на территории США доходов от хищения 5,4 миллиардов рублей у российских граждан – преступления, раскрытого Сергеем Магнитским.

 

Денис Кацыв – сын вице-президента ОАО «Российские железные дороги» Петра Кацыва, долгое время занимавшего должности вице-премьера Правительства и Министра транспорта Московской области. Бизнес Дениса Кацыва был выстроен на контрактах с правительством и госучреждениями Московской области, контролировавшейся его отцом-чиновником. На контрактах с госструктурами Московской области зарабатывала и нынешний адвокат Дениса Кацыва Наталья Весельницкая, чей муж был заместителем Петра Кацыва на посту Министра транспорта Московской области.

 

О деле Сергея Магнитского и раскрытии им обстоятельств хищения из бюджета 5,4 миллиардов рублей, его последующем аресте и убийстве в следственном изоляторе подробно рассказывает книга-международный бестселлер Уильяма Браудера «Красный циркуляр», которая бесплатно доступна читателям в электронном виде на русском языке (http://www.billbrowder.com/Portals/0/downloads/Browder_Red%20Notice_RU_FINAL.pdf ).

 

Обосновывая необходимость проведения уголовного расследования в США фирм Дениса Кацыва, Прокуратура США указала на уже установленные обстоятельства соучастия фирм Кацыва в преступной деятельности — отмывании доходов от хищения 5,4 миллиардов рублей.

 

«Ответчики по иску [компании Дениса Кацыва] участвовали в отмывании доходов, полученных от мошенничества в России, что само по себе является сложной комбинацией уголовных преступлений», - заявила Прокуратура США.

 

Прокуратура США ранее сообщала, что кипрская фирма Дениса Кацыва «Превезон Холдингс Лтд», по официальной версии занимающаяся инвестициями в недвижимость, менее чем через три месяца после хищения из российского бюджета 5,4 миллиардов рублей (или около 230 миллионов долларов) получила около двух миллионов долларов из похищенных средств от подставных компаний, не осуществлявших реальной коммерческой деятельности. Платежи  были получены «Превезоном» якобы в оплату поставок сантехнического оборудования, а именно  свыше полутысячи ванных марки «Доктор Джет» производства Италии размером 190 x 12095 x 65, и запчастей для автомобилей. Указанные товары «Превезоном» никогда не поставлялись.

 

В «Превезоне» эти платежи объясняют договоренностью между 22-летним директором фирмы Тимофеем Критом и «инвестором Петровым» об инвестициях в недвижимость и отрицают осведомленность о подложных документах.

 

Прокуратура США также обнаружила другие фиктивные и сомнительные платежи в адрес «Превезона» на сумму свыше 2 миллионов долларов от компаний с Белиза, Британских Виргинских островов и др., якобы осуществленных в оплату поставок технического,  компьютерного и видео оборудования, которое «Превезоном» также никогда не поставлялось.

 

В рамках гражданского иска Правительства США к «Превезону» об отмывании доходов суд Нью-Йорка в сентябре 2013 года наложил арест на активы Дениса Кацыва в США стоимостью около 14 миллионов долларов, включая недвижимость в престижном нью-йоркском районе Манхэттен.

 

В октябре 2015 года суд Нью-Йорка подтвердил обоснованность ареста имущества «Превезона» в силу имеющихся у Правительства США подозрений об участии в отмывании преступных доходов.

 

В сентябре 2012 года Генеральная прокуратура Швейцарии заморозила свыше 7 миллионов долларов на счетах Дениса Кацыва, его партнера Александра Литвака, а также компаний Кацыва «Превезон», «Ференкой» и «Колевинс» в рамках уголовного дела об отмывании через швейцарские банки похищенных из бюджета России 5,4 миллиардов рублей. Швейцарский суд подтвердил обоснованность ареста прокуратурой счетов Дениса Кацыва, отклонив его апелляцию.

 

Вопрос об уголовной ответственности компаний Кацыва будет рассматривать большая коллегия присяжных США.

 

«Целесообразно установить путем заседания большой коллегии присяжных вопрос о соучастии ответчиков по иску [компаний Кацыва] в совершении мошенничества, от которого ими были получены доходы», — заявила Прокуратура США.

 

Задача заседания большой коллегии (жюри) присяжных — решить, достаточны ли основания для проведения уголовного судебного процесса против обвиняемого. Обычно, в конце заседания жюри, обвиняемый оповещается о решении присяжных и назначается дата начала судебного разбирательства.

 

«Расследование большой коллегии присяжных еще не завершено», — сообщил Департамент юстиции США в своем заявлении.

 

Ранее  в рамках американского процесса против компании Дениса Кацыва стало известно, что Прокуратура США отследила 64 перевода через американские банки на миллионы долларов, полученных от хищения из бюджета 5,4 миллиардов рублей организованной преступной группой Дмитрия Клюева и последующего отмывания украденных у россиян денег.

 

Напомним, в 2005 году у компании Кацывов («Марташ») в рамках израильского расследования об отмывании денег было конфисковано около 8 миллионов долларов правительством Израиля.

 

Программа «Справедливость для Сергея Магнитского»

 

+44 207 440 1777

e‑mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

www.facebook.com/russianuntouchables

http://www.billbrowder.com/Portals/0/downloads/Browder_Red%20Notice_RU_FINAL.pdf

 

 

Russian Prosecutor Chaika Reacts to DC Lobbying Failure on Global Magnitsky With New Attack on William Browder

May 21, 2016

PRESS RELEASE

For Imme­di­ate distribution

Russ­ian Pros­e­cu­tor Chai­ka Reacts to DC Lob­by­ing Fail­ure on Glob­al Mag­nit­sky With New Attack on William Browder

 

21 May 2016 – With­in 24 hours of the fail­ure of Russ­ian-spon­sored lob­by­ists to remove the name “Mag­nit­sky” from the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Act at the House For­eign Affairs Com­mit­tee, at 19:39 on 19 May 2016, the Russ­ian Gen­er­al Prosecutor’s Office respond­ed by mak­ing a pub­lic announce­ment of the con­tin­u­a­tion of crim­i­nal cas­es against William Brow­der, leader of the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Jus­tice Move­ment, and his colleagues.

 

Lob­by­ists rep­re­sent­ing a Russ­ian nation­al who is under inves­ti­ga­tion for mon­ey laun­der­ing by the US Depart­ment of Jus­tice, approached a num­ber of mem­bers of the House For­eign Affairs Com­mit­tee and staffers in the week of May 16, 2016 try­ing to con­vince the con­gress­men to vote in favor of an amend­ment to remove the name of Mag­nit­sky from the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Act.

 

They made a num­ber of defam­a­to­ry com­ments about William Brow­der, the head of the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Jus­tice Cam­paign, to jus­ti­fy their request. Their efforts failed, except on Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Dana Rohrabach­er, who pro­posed the amend­ment. The House For­eign Rela­tions Com­mit­tee reject­ed the amendment.

 

In response to the fail­ure of Russ­ian state-spon­sored smear cam­paign against William Brow­der in Wash­ing­ton, the Russ­ian Gen­er­al Prosecutor’s Office decid­ed to re-announce its ille­git­i­mate and polit­i­cal­ly moti­vat­ed pro­ceed­ings against him in Rus­sia as “news.” These alle­ga­tions are three years old and have been pre­vi­ous­ly reject­ed as mer­it­less and polit­i­cal­ly moti­vat­ed by INTERPOL and by the Coun­cil of Europe, com­pris­ing 47 mem­ber states,” said Her­mitage representative.

 

The re-announced crim­i­nal pro­ceed­ings in Rus­sia relate to The Her­mitage Fund trad­ing shares in Gazprom near­ly twen­ty years ago. The share pur­chas­es had been reviewed at the time by Gazprom itself, the Russ­ian Fed­er­al Secu­ri­ties Com­mis­sion, the Russ­ian tax author­i­ties and the Pros­e­cu­tor’s Office who all con­firmed the law­ful­ness of the transactions.

 

The unfound­ed, arbi­trary and selec­tive accu­sa­tions in this case are hall­marks of polit­i­cal­ly moti­vat­ed abuse of the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem, which has been char­ac­ter­is­tic of the Mag­nit­sky case in Rus­sia,” said Her­mitage representative.

 

The Russ­ian state attack on William Brow­der esca­lat­ed since the press con­fer­ence of Russ­ian Pres­i­dent Vladimir Putin in Decem­ber 2012 where he was asked about Sergei Mag­nit­sky on sev­en occa­sions. In response, Pres­i­dent Putin said that he knew that Sergei Mag­nit­sky was not a human rights defend­er, but “Mr Browder’s lawyer,” and promised to “delve deep­er” in the case. A month lat­er, in Jan­u­ary 2013, Russ­ian author­i­ties opened crim­i­nal pro­ceed­ings against William Brow­der in rela­tion to invest­ing in Gazprom shares near­ly 20 years ago. This same case was the sub­ject of the Russ­ian Gen­er­al Prosecutor’s announce­ment on 19 May 2016, one day after Russ­ian pro­pa­gan­da efforts failed to remove the name of Sergei Mag­nit­sky from the title of the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky leg­is­la­tion in Wash­ing­ton, in spite of enlist­ing a web of lob­by­ists and con­sul­tants of all kinds.

 

The Russ­ian anti-Mag­nit­sky offen­sive in Wash­ing­ton was coor­di­nat­ed with the attacks on civ­il activists at home, with at least two new crim­i­nal probes announced against anti-cor­rup­tion activist Alex­ei Naval­ny – one for alleged­ly slan­der­ing Pavel Kar­pov, sanc­tioned for his role in the Mag­nit­sky case; and anoth­er for involve­ment in a pur­port­ed CIA oper­a­tion to mur­der Sergei Mag­nit­sky in Russ­ian police cus­tody on instruc­tions from William Browder.

 

The Russ­ian Prosecutor’s Office is spread­ing dis­in­for­ma­tion and abus­ing its crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem to pro­tect cor­rupt Russ­ian offi­cials and crim­i­nals who stole US$230 mil­lion. It is this brazen impuni­ty which neces­si­tates West­ern Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions,” said William Browder.

 

Sergei Mag­nit­sky, Hermitage’s lawyer who uncov­ered the US$230 mil­lion fraud and tes­ti­fied about the com­plic­i­ty of Russ­ian offi­cials in it, was false­ly arrest­ed, detained for 358 days with­out tri­al, tor­tured and killed in Russ­ian police cus­tody at the age of 37, leav­ing a wife and two children.

 

The unprece­dent­ed events of this case are described in the New-York Times best-sell­er “Red Notice. How I Became Putin’s No 1 Ene­my by William Brow­der, leader of the glob­al Mag­nit­sky jus­tice move­ment, and in a series of explo­sive cam­paign videos on Youtube chan­nel “Russ­ian Untouch­ables.”

 

For more infor­ma­tion, please contact:

 

Jus­tice for Sergei Magnitsky

+44 207 440 1777

e‑mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

billbrowder.com

twitter.com/Billbrowder

 

Statement in Response to Representative Dana Rohrabacher’s Remarks at the House Foreign Affairs Committee Mark-up on Global Magnitsky

May 19, 2016

PRESS RELEASE

For Imme­di­ate distribution

State­ment in Response to Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Dana Rohrabacher’s Remarks at the House For­eign Affairs Com­mit­tee Mark-up on Glob­al Magnitsky

 

19 May 2016 – On 18 May 2016, the U.S. House For­eign Rela­tions Com­mit­tee passed the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky bill, which cre­ates con­se­quences for cor­rupt offi­cials and human rights abusers around the world in the form of visa bans and asset freezes.

 

Dur­ing the mark-up of the bill, Con­gress­man Dana Rohrabach­er, from Orange Coun­ty, Cal­i­for­nia, pro­posed an amend­ment to exclude Magnitsky’s name from the title of the bill. To jus­ti­fy his amend­ment, Con­gress­man Rohrabach­er referred to a “confus­ing sit­u­a­tion” and “seri­ous ques­tions” that “Mag­nit­sky was being held [in Russ­ian deten­tion] because the Russ­ian Gov­ern­ment knew that there was $230 mil­lion of tax lia­bil­i­ty that they did not have the funds, that Mr Brow­der, that was his tax lia­bil­i­ty.

 

Con­gress­man Rohrabacher’s remarks imply that Her­mitage did not pay the US$230 mil­lion in tax­es to the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment, and the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment was con­cerned about recov­er­ing these funds from the start. These claims are wrong, and are con­tra­dict­ed by the facts and pub­licly avail­able doc­u­ments, including:

 

(i) Doc­u­men­tary evi­dence that the US$230 mil­lion in tax­es had been paid by the Her­mitage Fund’s Russ­ian com­pa­nies to the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment in 2006,

ii) Doc­u­men­tary evi­dence that those US$230 mil­lion were stolen a year lat­er through a mas­sive fraud per­pe­trat­ed by a Russ­ian crim­i­nal organ­i­sa­tion com­pris­ing Russ­ian offi­cials, who stole Her­mitage com­pa­nies and then approved in one day the wire trans­fers of US$230 mil­lion away from the Russ­ian trea­sury to accounts opened by known Russ­ian crim­i­nals to a bank owned by a con­vict­ed Russ­ian criminal;

(iii) Doc­u­men­tary evi­dence that Russ­ian author­i­ties ignored Her­mitage’s orig­i­nal reports and com­plaints about the US$230 mil­lion fraud,

(iv) Doc­u­men­tary evi­dence that the Russ­ian author­i­ties did not look for the stolen mon­ey, and instead organ­ised retal­ia­to­ry crim­i­nal cas­es against Hermitage’s Russ­ian lawyers includ­ing Sergei Magnitsky.

The facts of the US$230 mil­lion fraud abet­ted by Russ­ian offi­cials are described in con­tem­po­ra­ne­ous com­plaints filed by Her­mitage, as well as in tes­ti­monies giv­en by Sergey Mag­nit­sky nam­ing the per­pe­tra­tors, bank state­ments pro­vid­ed by whistle­blow­er Alexan­der Perepilich­nyy show­ing the acqui­si­tion of mul­ti-mil­lion dol­lar prop­er­ties and cash going to accounts of and for the ben­e­fit of Russ­ian offi­cials involved with the US$230 mil­lion fraud,  mil­lions of dol­lars in assets and lav­ish lifestyles of Russ­ian offi­cials impli­cat­ed in Magnitsky’s tes­ti­mo­ny for their role in the US$230 mil­lion fraud, and, most recent­ly, the Pana­ma Papers’ leak show­ing some of the stolen US$230 mil­lion reach­ing the cor­po­rate account of Sergei Roldug­in, a close friend of Russ­ian Pres­i­dent Vladimir Putin.
Con­gress­man Rohrabacher’s remarks are also con­tra­dict­ed by find­ings of inde­pen­dent author­i­ta­tive bod­ies, includ­ing the Coun­cil of Europe, who con­duct­ed a year-long inde­pen­dent inves­ti­ga­tion of the Mag­nit­sky case, and sum­ma­rized its con­clu­sions in a detailed report adopt­ed in Jan­u­ary 2014, called “Refus­ing Impuni­ty for the Killers of Sergei Mag­nit­sky.” The report­found the exis­tence in Rus­sia of a “mas­sive cov­er-up involv­ing senior offi­cials of the com­pe­tent min­istries, the Pros­e­cu­tor General’s Office, the Inves­tiga­tive Com­mit­tee and even cer­tain courts” and urged that “the cov­er-up must be reversed and the true cul­prits must be held to account.

 

In sup­port of his remarks against Brow­der, Con­gress­man Rohrabach­er brought up two arti­cles which pre­sent­ed attacks on Brow­der by the legal defense team of Denis Kat­syv, the son of a Russ­ian offi­cial, who is unsuc­cess­ful­ly try­ing to appeal a US court order and unfreeze US$14 mil­lion of his assets seized under the US Government’s mon­ey laun­der­ing and civ­il for­fei­ture action in rela­tion to the Mag­nit­sky case. The U.S. Depart­ment of Jus­tice has described Katsyv’s alle­ga­tions in rela­tion to William Brow­der as “false,”“wild”, and “untrue,” and his con­duct — as “egre­gious” and “inex­cus­able.”

 

Con­gress­man Rohrabach­er also crit­i­cized Brow­der for threat­en­ing legal action against NBC. The sto­ry he is refer­ring to was an attempt by NBC’s reporter Ken Dilan­ian to repeat alle­ga­tions from Katsyv’s team that Sergei Mag­nit­sky was­n’t beat­en in cus­tody and was nev­er a whis­tle-blow­er. Both claims were in con­tra­dic­tion to pub­licly avail­able evi­dence from the Russ­ian Gov­ern­ment. Promi­nent Russ­ian human rights defend­ers, Lud­mi­la Alex­ee­va and Valery Borschev, who per­son­al­ly inves­ti­gat­ed the Mag­nit­sky case, spoke out against Ken Dilanian’s attempt to mis­rep­re­sent key facts about the Magnitsky’s case in pub­lic state­ments and in an open let­ter to NBC Uni­ver­sal CEO Steve Burke. Ken Dilan­ian had pre­vi­ous­ly allowed his sources to influ­ence or write his con­tent.

 

After Rohrabacher’s inter­ven­tion, the House For­eign Affairs Com­mit­tee sub­se­quent­ly vot­ed to reject his amend­ment and passed the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky bill, which will now be up for a vote on the House floor. The date of the vote is not known yet.

 

The Glob­al Mag­nit­sky bill is named after Sergei Mag­nit­sky, Hermitage’s lawyer who in 2007 – 2008 uncov­ered a mas­sive fraud per­pe­trat­ed by Russ­ian offi­cials and organ­ised crim­i­nals to steal US$230 mil­lion that the three com­pa­nies of the Her­mitage Fund had paid to the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment in prof­it tax a year before, in 2006.  Sergei Mag­nit­sky tes­ti­fied about the fraud, named offi­cials involved, was then arrest­ed by impli­cat­ed offi­cials, kept in cus­tody with­out tri­al for 358 days in tor­tur­ous con­di­tions, denied fam­i­ly vis­its and med­ical care, and was killed on 16 Novem­ber 2009 at the age of 37, leav­ing a moth­er, a wife and two children.

 

In 2010, Sergei Mag­nit­sky was posthu­mous­ly award­ed by Trans­paren­cy Inter­na­tion­al, a glob­al anti-cor­rup­tion organ­i­sa­tion, with ‘Integri­ty Award’ in recog­ni­tion of his stance against Russ­ian cor­rup­tion and offi­cial abuse.

 

For more infor­ma­tion, please contact:

 

Jus­tice for Sergei Magnitsky

+44 207 440 1777

e‑mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

http://www.billbrowder.com/

https://twitter.com/Billbrowder

 

 

Senators Cardin and McCain Call for a Swift Passage of Global Magnitsky After Clearing the House Foreign Affairs Committee

May 19, 2016

PRESS RELEASE

For Imme­di­ate distribution

 

Sen­a­tors Cardin and McCain Call for a Swift Pas­sage of Glob­al Mag­nit­sky After Clear­ing the House For­eign Affairs Committee

 

19 May 2016 – Fol­low­ing yesterday’s approval of the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Human Rights bill by the House For­eign Affairs Com­mit­tee, Sen­a­tors Cardin and McCain called on the House speak­er to swift­ly bring it to a vote.

 

For too long in too many coun­tries, per­pe­tra­tors of human rights vio­la­tions and grand cor­rup­tion have not been held to account for their crimes and yet con­tin­ue to enjoy trav­el and finan­cial priv­i­leges in the Unit­ed States. With today’s House For­eign Affairs Com­mit­tee pas­sage of the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Human Rights and Account­abil­i­ty Act, we are one step clos­er to pre­vent­ing such impuni­ty, — said Sen­a­tors Ben Cardin and John McCain in a joint state­ment. — We …call on Speak­er Ryan to ensure a full House vote on Glob­al Mag­nit­sky with­out delay.”

 

Cardin and McCain, the two orig­i­nal co-spon­sors of the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky bill, spoke about the impor­tance of Sergei Mag­nit­sky’s legacy.

 

The bill is named for Sergei Mag­nit­sky, who has the unfor­tu­nate dis­tinc­tion of serv­ing as a prime exam­ple of the cor­rupt, hor­rif­ic crimes that befall count­less inno­cent peo­ple world­wide. Mr. Mag­nit­sky lost his life for sim­ply doing his job and try­ing to do the right thing when he dis­cov­ered wide­spread fraud and abuse of pow­er in Rus­sia. Just like Mag­nit­sky, human rights defend­ers are vic­tim­ized and stig­ma­tized around the globe,” said sen­a­tors Cardin and McCain.

 

The House For­eign Affairs Com­mit­tee reject­ed an amend­ment pro­posed by 68-year old Con­gress­man Dana Rohrabach­er seek­ing to remove the name of Mag­nit­sky from the Glob­al Human Rights bill. To jus­ti­fy his amend­ment, Con­gress­man Rohrabach­er claimed he could not fig­ure out who stole US$230 mil­lion from the Russ­ian bud­get – Sergei Mag­nit­sky or Russ­ian offi­cials. This is despite the fact that the mon­ey has been found in the accounts of Russ­ian offi­cials and their fam­i­lies and most recent­ly, through the Pana­ma Papers, on account of Sergei Roldug­in, a close friend of Russ­ian Pres­i­dent Vladimir Putin.

 

Oth­er Con­gress­men firm­ly reject­ed Con­gress­man Rohrabacher’s amend­ment describ­ing it as an unac­cept­able attempt to “rewrite history.”

 

Con­gress­man Con­nol­ly said that it was impor­tant to call out behav­iour of Pres­i­dent Putin which did not adhere to inter­na­tion­al norms, “whether in Crimea or in a prison cell.”

 

Russ­ian vet­er­an human rights defend­er Lud­mi­la Alex­ee­va, chair of the Moscow Helsin­ki Group, sent a mes­sage to mem­bers of the House For­eign Affairs Com­mit­tee ahead of the mark up, stating:

 

Con­gress­man Dana Rohrabach­er has been fooled by the Russ­ian dis­in­for­ma­tion, and has argued that the name of Sergei Mag­nit­sky be dropped from the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Human Rights Bill. To do this would be a gross betray­al of the human rights move­ment, and of the lega­cy of Sergei Mag­nit­sky who had sto­ical­ly sac­ri­ficed his life in con­fronting cor­rup­tion and offi­cial abuse in Rus­sia. … To remove his name from the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Human Rights bill would be a sell­out of vic­tims of oppres­sion and abuse every­where around the world, whom Serge Mag­nit­sky has giv­en hope, and of the prin­ci­ples of integri­ty he had paid with his life.”

 

Dur­ing the mark-up, con­gress­man Engel said the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky bill would show to all that human rights abuse and cor­rup­tion can­not go on with impuni­ty:

 

This leg­is­la­tion would send a pow­er­ful mes­sage that human-rights abusers and cor­rup­tion aren’t just inter­nal mat­ters.  They are the con­cern of all coun­tries, and they should not be per­mit­ted to go on with impunity.”

 

On the eve of the Glob­al Mag­nit­sky bill’s mark-up, Russ­ian author­i­ties announced a new crim­i­nal case against Alex­ei Naval­ny, the Russ­ian anti-cor­rup­tion activist and Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions sup­port­er. The new case was opened in response to a com­plaint from ex police offi­cer Pavel Kar­pov, who has been sanc­tioned by the US and the Euro­pean Par­lia­ment for his role in Mag­nit­sky case.

 

Last month, the Russ­ian author­i­ties also announced anoth­er crim­i­nal probe opened on anoth­er spu­ri­ous appli­ca­tion of Pavel Kar­pov against Alex­ei Naval­ny and William Brow­der for mur­der of Sergei Mag­nit­sky in Russ­ian police cus­tody, as part of a CIA plan.

 

The rea­son for the most recent attack on civ­il soci­ety lead­ers and out­burst of the Russ­ian dis­in­for­ma­tion on the Mag­nit­sky case is the fear of cor­rupt Russ­ian offi­cials to not be able to enjoy the fruits of their cor­rup­tion in the West as a result of Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions. To fight the Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions, they use fab­ri­cat­ed crim­i­nal cas­es, and dis­in­for­ma­tion both inside the coun­try and in the West. Russ­ian civ­il soci­ety lead­ers and inde­pen­dent media have been almost com­plete­ly shut down, while the Russ­ian pop­u­la­tion is fed a diet of myths and dis­in­for­ma­tion,” said William Brow­der, a leader of the glob­al jus­tice for Sergei Mag­nit­sky move­ment and author of “Red Notice: How I Became Putin’s No 1 Ene­my.

 

Sergei Mag­nit­sky, who exposed the theft of US$230 mil­lion from the Russ­ian bud­get and gave tes­ti­mo­ny impli­cat­ing gov­ern­ment offi­cials, was arrest­ed and killed in Moscow deten­tion cen­ter in Novem­ber 2009. Those respon­si­ble for his death and those he exposed for the US$230 mil­lion theft have not been brought to justice.

 

Glob­al Mag­nit­sky Human Rights Account­abil­i­ty Act passed the U.S. Sen­ate vote in Decem­ber 2015.

 

For more infor­ma­tion, please contact

Jus­tice for Sergei Magnitsky

+44 207 440 1777

e‑mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

http://www.billbrowder.com/

https://twitter.com/Billbrowder?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

 

« Previous PageNext Page »

  • Link

Hermitage TV

Visit “Stop the Untouchables” site

For more information please visit http://russian-untouchables.com site..